Enterprise Infrastructure Guide

Private LLM Deployment Guide: Self-Hosted AI Infrastructure

Deploy Large Language Models on your own infrastructure without sharing data with third parties. Complete guide to vLLM, infrastructure planning, security, and production deployment.

50 min read
For Technical Leaders & DevOps Teams
Updated January 2025

Introduction: The Case for Private AI

While cloud-based LLM APIs offer convenience, many enterprises require complete control over their AI infrastructure. Private LLM deployment ensures data never leaves your infrastructure, enables unlimited customization, and can be more cost-effective at scale.

Why Deploy Private LLMs?

Organizations processing sensitive data, requiring HIPAA/GDPR compliance, or operating at high volume (1M+ requests/month) often find private deployment necessary and cost-effective.

Key Benefits of Private Deployment

Complete Data Privacy
Sensitive data never leaves your infrastructure
Regulatory Compliance
Meet HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 requirements
Cost Predictability
Fixed infrastructure costs vs. per-token pricing
Performance Control
Optimize latency and throughput for your needs
Model Customization
Fine-tune and modify models without restrictions
No Vendor Lock-in
Switch between open-source models freely
Unlimited Requests
No rate limits or throttling
Offline Capability
Operate without internet connectivity

Important Considerations

Private deployment requires technical expertise, upfront infrastructure investment, and ongoing maintenance. Evaluate whether the benefits justify the complexity for your use case. For many organizations, a hybrid approach (API for development, private for production) offers the best balance.

1Understanding Your Deployment Options

Multiple solutions exist for private LLM deployment, each optimized for different use cases and technical requirements. Choose based on your scale, expertise, and infrastructure.

Inference Platforms Comparison

vLLM

High-performance inference server with advanced batching

✓ Best for: Production deployments requiring maximum throughput

Advantages
  • Fastest inference speed
  • PagedAttention for efficiency
  • Continuous batching
  • OpenAI-compatible API
Limitations
  • Steeper learning curve
  • Requires GPU infrastructure
Ideal Use Case: 1M+ requests/month, low-latency requirements

Ollama

Developer-friendly local LLM runtime with simple interface

✓ Best for: Development, prototyping, and smaller deployments

Advantages
  • Easiest to get started
  • Great developer experience
  • Model library included
  • CPU support
Limitations
  • Limited scalability
  • Less production-focused
Ideal Use Case: Development environments, single-user applications

Text Generation Inference (TGI)

Hugging Face's production-ready inference toolkit

✓ Best for: Balanced ease-of-use and performance

Advantages
  • Easy Hugging Face integration
  • Good documentation
  • Built-in monitoring
  • Quantization support
Limitations
  • Not as fast as vLLM
  • Opinionated architecture
Ideal Use Case: 100K-1M requests/month, Hugging Face ecosystem

TensorRT-LLM

NVIDIA's optimized inference engine for maximum performance

✓ Best for: Highest performance needs with NVIDIA GPUs

Advantages
  • Best GPU utilization
  • Lowest latency
  • Advanced optimizations
  • Multi-GPU support
Limitations
  • NVIDIA GPUs only
  • Complex setup
  • Limited model support
Ideal Use Case: Ultra-low latency, NVIDIA infrastructure

Infrastructure Deployment Models

On-Premise

Own hardware in your data center

Maximum control
No cloud costs
Lowest latency
High upfront cost
Maintenance burden
Scaling difficulty

Private Cloud

AWS VPC, Azure Private, GCP

Scalable
Managed infrastructure
Quick setup
Ongoing costs
Some vendor dependency
Compliance complexity

Hybrid

Combination of on-prem and cloud

Flexibility
Cost optimization
Disaster recovery
Complex management
Network overhead
Higher expertise needed

2Architecture & Infrastructure Planning

Proper infrastructure planning ensures optimal performance and cost-efficiency. Hardware requirements vary dramatically based on model size and expected throughput.

GPU Requirements by Model Size

Model SizeExample ModelsMin VRAM (FP16)Min VRAM (4-bit)Recommended GPU
7B parametersLlama 3 8B, Mistral 7B16 GB6 GBRTX 4090, L40S
13B parametersLlama 2 13B, Vicuna 13B28 GB10 GBA40, A100 40GB
34B parametersYi 34B, Mixtral 8x7B70 GB24 GBA100 80GB, 2× A40
70B parametersLlama 3 70B, Falcon 70B140 GB45 GB2× A100 80GB, H100
405B parametersLlama 3.1 405B810 GB200 GB8× H100 80GB

Memory Calculation Formula

VRAM Required = Model Parameters × Precision (bytes) × 1.2 (overhead)

FP16: 2 bytes per parameter (70B model = 140 GB + 20% overhead = 168 GB)

INT8: 1 byte per parameter (70B model = 70 GB + 20% = 84 GB)

4-bit (GPTQ/AWQ): 0.5 bytes per parameter (70B model = 35 GB + 20% = 42 GB)

Complete Infrastructure Stack

Compute Layer

  • GPU: NVIDIA A100, H100, L40S, or RTX 4090 (for smaller models)
  • CPU: 32+ cores for handling concurrent requests
  • RAM: 256 GB+ system memory for large batch processing
  • Cooling: Enterprise-grade for sustained high utilization

Storage Layer

  • SSD: 1TB+ NVMe for model storage and fast loading
  • Model cache: 500 GB per major model variant
  • Logs & metrics: 100 GB per month
  • Backup: 2-3× model storage for redundancy

Network Layer

  • Bandwidth: 10 Gbps+ for multi-GPU communication
  • Low latency: <1ms between GPU nodes
  • Load balancer: NGINX or HAProxy for distribution
  • VPN: Site-to-site for hybrid deployments

Monitoring & Observability

  • Metrics: Prometheus + Grafana for GPU utilization
  • Logging: ELK or Loki for centralized logs
  • Tracing: Jaeger for request tracking
  • Alerting: PagerDuty or Opsgenie integration

3Implementation Roadmap

Follow a phased approach to minimize risk and demonstrate value early. Each phase builds on the previous one with increasing scale and sophistication.

1

Phase 1: Proof of Concept (Weeks 1-4)

🎯 Goal: Validate technical feasibility and basic performance

Key Tasks:
  • Set up single-GPU development environment
  • Deploy Ollama or vLLM with 7B model
  • Build basic API integration
  • Benchmark inference speed and accuracy
  • Test with real use cases (100-1000 requests)
Deliverables:
  • Working prototype on single GPU
  • Performance benchmark report
  • Cost projection for production scale
  • Technical architecture document
Success Criteria: Sub-second response time, 90%+ accuracy vs. baseline
2

Phase 2: Production Deployment (Weeks 5-12)

🎯 Goal: Deploy scalable production infrastructure

Key Tasks:
  • Set up multi-GPU production cluster
  • Implement load balancing and redundancy
  • Configure monitoring and alerting
  • Establish security and access controls
  • Deploy to staging for testing
  • Conduct load testing (100K+ requests)
  • Create runbooks and documentation
Deliverables:
  • Production-ready cluster
  • Monitoring dashboards
  • Security audit report
  • Operational runbooks
Success Criteria: 99.9% uptime, handles peak load, all security controls active
3

Phase 3: Optimization & Fine-tuning (Weeks 13-20)

🎯 Goal: Maximize performance and reduce costs

Key Tasks:
  • Fine-tune model on domain-specific data
  • Implement quantization (4-bit) for efficiency
  • Optimize batching and caching strategies
  • Set up auto-scaling based on load
  • Conduct A/B testing vs. baseline
  • Measure and improve GPU utilization
Deliverables:
  • Fine-tuned model with improved accuracy
  • Optimized infrastructure (30-50% cost reduction)
  • Auto-scaling policies
  • Performance optimization report
Success Criteria: 2x throughput, 40% cost reduction, improved accuracy
4

Phase 4: Scale & Expand (Ongoing)

🎯 Goal: Scale to full production and new use cases

Key Tasks:
  • Roll out to all users and applications
  • Add additional models for different use cases
  • Establish model versioning and deployment pipeline
  • Build internal expertise and training
  • Continuous monitoring and improvement
  • Expand to new geographic regions if needed
Deliverables:
  • Multi-model production deployment
  • CI/CD pipeline for model updates
  • Training program for internal teams
  • Disaster recovery plan
Success Criteria: Supports 1M+ monthly requests, multiple use cases live

4Security & Compliance

Private LLM deployment provides the foundation for strong security, but proper implementation is essential. Address network isolation, access controls, compliance requirements, and audit trails.

Security Architecture Layers

Network Security

Network Isolation
Deploy in private VLAN/VPC with no internet access
VPN Access
Require VPN for all connections to LLM endpoints
Firewall Rules
Whitelist only necessary ports and IPs
TLS Encryption
Enforce TLS 1.3 for all communications

Access Control

Authentication
OAuth 2.0 or SAML for user authentication
Authorization
Role-based access control (RBAC) with least privilege
API Keys
Rotate keys every 90 days, scope to specific services
MFA
Require multi-factor auth for admin access

Data Protection

Encryption at Rest
AES-256 encryption for model storage and logs
Encryption in Transit
TLS 1.3 for all data transmission
Input Sanitization
Validate and sanitize all inputs to prevent injection
Output Filtering
Filter PII and sensitive data from responses

Audit & Compliance

Audit Logging
Log all requests with user ID, timestamp, and action
Log Retention
Retain logs for 1-7 years based on compliance needs
Compliance Scanning
Regular vulnerability scans and penetration testing
Incident Response
Documented playbooks for security incidents

Compliance Framework Checklist

HIPAA Compliance

  • Encrypt all PHI data at rest and in transit
  • Maintain audit logs for all data access
  • Implement Business Associate Agreements (BAA)
  • Conduct annual risk assessments
  • Train staff on HIPAA requirements
  • Establish breach notification procedures

GDPR Compliance

  • Implement data minimization principles
  • Enable right to erasure (delete user data)
  • Conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments
  • Appoint Data Protection Officer if required
  • Document data processing activities
  • Ensure data portability capabilities

SOC 2 Type II

  • Establish and document security policies
  • Implement change management procedures
  • Monitor system availability (99.9%+ uptime)
  • Conduct regular security audits
  • Maintain incident response plan
  • Implement continuous monitoring

ISO 27001

  • Establish Information Security Management System
  • Conduct risk assessment and treatment
  • Implement security controls framework
  • Regular internal audits
  • Management review processes
  • Continuous improvement procedures

5Model Selection & Fine-Tuning

Choose the right open-source model based on your use case, then optimize through quantization and fine-tuning. Balance model capability, inference speed, and resource requirements.

Popular Open-Source Models (2025)

ModelSizeLicenseBest ForPerformance
Llama 3.18B, 70B, 405BMeta LicenseGeneral purpose, instruction followingExcellent
Mistral 7B7BApache 2.0Fast inference, efficientExcellent
Mixtral 8x7B47B (MoE)Apache 2.0High quality, cost-effectiveExcellent
Qwen 2.57B, 14B, 72BApache 2.0Multilingual, long contextExcellent
DeepSeek Coder6.7B, 33BMIT LicenseCode generation & analysisVery Good
Falcon 180B180BApache 2.0Maximum capabilityExcellent

Quantization Strategies

GPTQ

4-bit quantization with minimal accuracy loss

Memory:75% memory reduction
Accuracy:1-2% accuracy loss
Speed:Fast inference
Best for: Production deployments

AWQ

Activation-aware weight quantization

Memory:75% memory reduction
Accuracy:<1% accuracy loss
Speed:Faster than GPTQ
Best for: High-accuracy needs

GGUF

CPU-friendly quantization format

Memory:50-75% reduction
Accuracy:Varies by precision
Speed:Good CPU performance
Best for: CPU deployment

Fine-Tuning Approaches

Full Fine-Tuning

Update all model parameters on your data

High ($10K-$50K+)
2-4 weeks
Data Required: 10K-100K examples
Advantages:
  • Maximum customization
  • Best accuracy
  • Full control
Limitations:
  • Expensive
  • Requires expertise
  • Long training time
Best Use Case: Unique domain with large dataset

LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)

Train small adapter layers, keep base model frozen

Medium ($1K-$10K)
3-7 days
Data Required: 1K-10K examples
Advantages:
  • Cost-effective
  • Fast training
  • Multiple adapters
Limitations:
  • Slightly lower accuracy
  • Limited customization
Best Use Case: Most production use cases

QLoRA

LoRA with quantization for even lower memory

Low ($500-$5K)
2-5 days
Data Required: 1K-10K examples
Advantages:
  • Very cost-effective
  • Single GPU training
  • Fast iteration
Limitations:
  • Some accuracy tradeoff
  • Quantization overhead
Best Use Case: Budget-conscious deployments

Few-Shot Prompting

No training, just engineered prompts with examples

Very Low (<$500)
1-3 days
Data Required: 10-100 examples
Advantages:
  • No training needed
  • Instant results
  • Easy updates
Limitations:
  • Lower accuracy
  • Limited customization
  • Prompt engineering required
Best Use Case: Quick prototypes, simple tasks

6Cost Analysis & ROI Calculator

Private LLM deployment involves higher upfront costs but becomes more economical at scale. Calculate your break-even point based on request volume and infrastructure choices.

Infrastructure Cost Breakdown

ComponentOptionInitial CostMonthly CostNotes
GPU Server1× A100 40GB$15K$1,500/moCloud or $8K purchase + hosting
2× A100 80GB$30K$3,000/moFor 70B models
8× H100 80GB$200K$15,000/moFor 405B models
Storage2TB NVMe SSD$1K$100/moModel storage + cache
NetworkingLoad Balancer + VPN$500$200/moTraffic costs extra
MonitoringGrafana + Prometheus$0$0-$500/moSelf-hosted or managed
Personnel1 FTE DevOps$0$8K-$15K/moMaintenance & optimization
Total (Medium Deployment)$31.5K$5K-$12K/mo2× A100 80GB setup

Break-Even Analysis: Private vs. API

Customer Support Bot

Volume:100K requests/month
API Cost:$1,500/mo
Private Cost:$5,000/mo initial
Break-even:Month 1 (if >350K req/mo)
Recommendation:
Use API initially, switch at 500K+ req/mo

Document Processing

Volume:1M requests/month
API Cost:$15,000/mo
Private Cost:$8,000/mo
Break-even:Month 5
Recommendation:
Private deployment recommended

Internal Chatbot

Volume:10K daily users (300K/mo)
API Cost:$4,500/mo
Private Cost:$6,000/mo
Break-even:Month 3 (if usage grows)
Recommendation:
Hybrid: API dev, private production

Cost Optimization Tips

  • Use 4-bit quantization to reduce GPU requirements by 75%
  • Implement aggressive caching to reduce redundant inference
  • Auto-scale GPUs based on demand (spin down during off-hours)
  • Use spot instances or reserved instances for 40-70% cloud savings
  • Choose smaller specialized models over large general models when possible

7Performance Optimization

Maximize throughput and minimize latency through advanced optimization techniques. Proper optimization can double throughput while reducing costs by 40-50%.

Key Optimization Strategies

Continuous Batching

Process multiple requests in parallel by batching at the token level

2-5x throughput increase
Implementation Steps:
  1. 1Enable in vLLM with --max-batch-size parameter
  2. 2Start with batch size 32-64, tune based on GPU memory
  3. 3Monitor queue depth and adjust dynamically
  4. 4Use priority queues for time-sensitive requests
Success Metrics: Target: >80% GPU utilization, <2s p95 latency

KV Cache Optimization

Efficiently manage key-value cache to handle longer contexts

30-50% memory savings
Implementation Steps:
  1. 1Use PagedAttention (built into vLLM) for efficient memory management
  2. 2Set appropriate KV cache size based on max context length
  3. 3Enable prefix caching for repeated prompts
  4. 4Implement cache eviction policies for long-running instances
Success Metrics: Target: Support 4K+ context at 90%+ GPU memory utilization

Model Parallelism

Split model across multiple GPUs for large models

Enable larger models, reduce latency
Implementation Steps:
  1. 1Use tensor parallelism for large models (70B+)
  2. 2Pipeline parallelism for multi-node deployments
  3. 3Optimize communication with NCCL/RCCL
  4. 4Balance load across GPUs evenly
Success Metrics: Target: Linear scaling with GPU count (e.g., 2× GPUs = 1.8× throughput)

Speculative Decoding

Use smaller draft model to predict tokens, verify with main model

1.5-2x faster generation
Implementation Steps:
  1. 1Deploy small draft model (7B) alongside main model (70B)
  2. 2Draft model generates 3-5 token candidates
  3. 3Main model verifies in parallel
  4. 4Fallback to standard decoding if draft fails
Success Metrics: Target: 50%+ faster generation for long outputs

Caching & Memoization

Cache responses for identical or similar inputs

60-80% cost reduction for repeated queries
Implementation Steps:
  1. 1Implement semantic caching with embedding similarity
  2. 2Cache at multiple levels (exact match, fuzzy match, prefix)
  3. 3Use Redis or Memcached for distributed caching
  4. 4Set TTL based on content freshness requirements
Success Metrics: Target: >40% cache hit rate, <10ms cache lookup

8Production Best Practices

Running private LLMs in production requires robust monitoring, incident response, and continuous improvement processes. Follow these practices to ensure reliability and performance.

Monitoring & Alerting

  • Track GPU utilization, memory, temperature continuously
  • Monitor request latency (p50, p95, p99)
  • Alert on queue depth >100 requests
  • Track model accuracy drift over time
  • Monitor error rates and types
  • Set up uptime monitoring with PagerDuty

Deployment & Updates

  • Use blue-green deployment for zero-downtime updates
  • Test model changes in staging environment first
  • Implement gradual rollout (10% → 50% → 100%)
  • Keep rollback plan ready (previous model warm)
  • Version all models with semantic versioning
  • Document all changes in changelog

Incident Response

  • Create runbooks for common issues (OOM, slow inference)
  • Set up automated failover to backup infrastructure
  • Implement circuit breakers for cascading failures
  • Conduct post-mortems for all major incidents
  • Practice disaster recovery quarterly
  • Maintain on-call rotation with clear escalation

Capacity Planning

  • Track growth trends and forecast capacity needs
  • Maintain 30% headroom for traffic spikes
  • Plan for 3-6 month infrastructure lead times
  • Load test at 2x expected peak traffic
  • Document resource limits and scaling procedures
  • Review capacity monthly with stakeholders

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about private LLM deployment

Costs vary widely based on model size and scale. A small deployment (7B model, single GPU) costs $1,500-$3,000/month. Medium deployments (70B model, 2× A100) cost $8,000-$12,000/month including personnel. Large deployments (405B model, 8× H100) cost $20,000-$30,000/month. Break-even vs. API pricing typically occurs around 500K-1M requests/month.
Yes, but with significant performance tradeoffs. Quantized 7B models can run on CPU using Ollama or llama.cpp, but expect 10-100x slower inference. For production use cases requiring sub-second latency, GPUs are essential. Consider starting with cloud GPU rentals ($1.50-$3/hour) before purchasing hardware.
Deploy in a private VPC/VLAN with no internet access. Use VPN for all connections. Disable model telemetry and logging to external services. Audit network traffic regularly. Use air-gapped deployment for maximum security. All inference happens locally—no data is sent to external APIs. Document your data flow in compliance reports.
vLLM is optimized for high-throughput production deployments with advanced batching, while Ollama prioritizes ease of use and developer experience. vLLM offers 2-5x better throughput and supports OpenAI-compatible APIs, but requires more expertise to set up. Ollama is perfect for development and prototyping. Most organizations use Ollama for development and vLLM for production.
Timeline depends on complexity and team expertise. Proof of concept: 2-4 weeks. Production deployment: 8-12 weeks. Full optimization: 16-20 weeks. Accelerate by partnering with experts who have done it before. Most organizations see initial results in 4-6 weeks with a phased approach.
Most open-source LLMs (Llama 3, Mistral, Mixtral) allow commercial use, but check each model's license. Meta's Llama license permits commercial use. Apache 2.0 licensed models (Mistral, Falcon) have no restrictions. Some models restrict commercial use for organizations over certain revenue thresholds. Always review the license file in the model repository before deployment.

Still have questions?

Schedule a Free Consultation

Ready to Deploy Private LLMs?

You now have a comprehensive framework for deploying private LLM infrastructure. Take control of your AI stack, ensure complete data privacy, and unlock cost savings at scale.

100%
Data privacy & control
40-60%
Cost reduction at scale
8-12 weeks
To production deployment

Related Resources